Thursday, June 30, 2011

Post of the week - FPC's Fact and Fiction about Social Security

Another informative post from the FPC:

Fact and Fiction on Social Security 
It’s okay to cut Social Security since no one expects it to be around when they retire anyway: The program is a guarantee to the people who pay into it. They’ve earned the benefits that it gives, they aren’t just a privilege.

Social Security is a big contributor to the deficit and debt:
Social Security has not contributed a single cent to the deficit or debt. It currently has a $2.7 trillion surplus. That surplus will grow to $3.7 trillion by 2022. It is actually illegal for Social Security to go into deficit mode. The real causes of the deficit and debt growth are the Bush tax cuts, the recession, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, stimulus and recovery spending and the bank bailouts.

Times are tough, everyone has to share the sacrifice:
Banks and other companies have received massive bailouts and taxes for the rich have been cut. Ending bailouts and making the rich pay their fair share would go much further towards fixing our economic problems than harming Social Security would. It would have added benefit of being the morally correct thing to do.

Social Security is bankrupt and in a crisis:
Social Security is fully funded for the next 25 years. After that it can pay 77% of promosed benefits through 2085 and 74% after that, with no changes to the program as it is now.

There is no easy solution to fixing Social Security, so we have to do something difficult: There is a Social Security tax cap on people with wages more than $106,800 a year. If those people paid taxes on all of their income — like everyone else does — there would be no funding problems for Social Security. The program would be fully funded for at least the next 75 years.

The public favors changes and/or cuts to Social Security to reduce the deficit: 15% of the public does. 82% oppose cuts. Even 74% of Tea Party supporters oppose cuts. Similarly, large majorities of Americans oppose cuts to make the program solvent (67% oppose), oppose means testing the program (63%), oppose raising the retirement age to 69 (69%) and support eliminating the tax cap of $106,800 (66% support). The popular solution to potential future problems with Social Security is also the morally correct solution.

Continuing the payroll tax holiday is a good economic solution: The holiday increases corporate profits without stimulating hiring and cuts revenue coming into Social Security. Corporations don’t need a revenue boost. In the first quarter of 2011, they made a record $1.7 trillion in profits and the currently sit on a record $1.9 trillion in liquid assets. Corporations have more money than they’ve ever had and they aren’t hiring. Giving them more, in order to cut other programs, is a terrible idea. The holiday also is one of the worst ways possible to boost economic activity. Moody’s analytics says that extending unemployment benefits, increasing food stamps and providing direct aid to state governments all boost the economy significantly more than the payroll tax holiday.

Linking the Cost of Living Adjustments (cola) for recipients to the Consumer Price Index is a good solution: Tying cola to the CPI would be a major benefit cut to Social Security recipients and it would get bigger over time. Furthermore, despite Republican claims that their proposals don’t affect current recipients, the cola-CPI change would affect everyone. As it currently exists — even though it hasn’t been applied for two years — the cola is not enough to account for increasing health care costs. If the Republicans proposed Medicare changes are passed, the increase in costs for seniors will consume their entire Social Security check.

Raising the retirement age is a good solution:
Raising the retirement age would effectively work out to a 20% cut for retirees. This would disproportionately harm workers in the lower half of the earnings spectrum. These workers have not seen the same increase in life expectancy as the overall population and some groups have seen life expectancy declines, meaning an even bigger benefit cut for those workers. People who work in physically demanding jobs (nearly half of workers over 58) will find it difficult or impossible to extend their careers until they reach 69. Age discrimination also makes it harder for older workers to find jobs.

Means testing Social Security is a good solution:
Only 2% of Social Security benefits go to people with an income over $100,000 or more a year, so cutting benefits for them would make little difference in the funding for the program. If the means test were set at a lower level, it would have to have a negative impact on middle class recipients, not just the wealthy.

Social Security is a wasteful program:
Less than 1% of program costs go to administrative costs. Social Security is the largest and most successful program in terms of providing aid to the disabled, children, women, veterans and other groups in society. These groups are served very well by Social Security and any cuts to the program will increase poverty and other associated problems for these groups. This is while offering recipients an average of $13-$14,000 per year, making it one of the least generous retirement programs in the world. The program lifts 20 million Americans out of poverty.

(source)

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

John Coleman: Part-time journalist, full-time ass-clown.

John Coleman, a journalist from Texas and founder (along with Frank Batten) of the Weather Channel is getting a lot of positive attention from The Right for blogging to readers they should know that “dastardly” scientists and “university-types” are in a massive conspiracy against business to broaden a “totally-slanted, bogus” claim, that he insists, is global warming.

Coleman says “like-minded PHD colleagues” review data without question and that government steered research grants keep the global warming movement going. He is absolutely certain that scientists as a whole devise, control and steer data to favor global warming in order to manipulate the public.

The closest point to scientific validation is that he says his expertise lies in meteorology, which makes perfect sense given that meteorology might not train one to understand the science of global warming. Except John Coleman doesn’t have a degree in meteorology; he has a degree in journalism.

Here is John Coleman.

No global warming = more "dastardly" donuts

And here is a polar bear face-palming John Coleman.



A link that allowed me to download the entire article hoping John didn’t completely embarrass himself and at least might have included some sources to reinforce his claims. I shouldn’t have been so optimistic; there are no sources whatsoever in the short-version or long-version of the post.

That's a shocker.

John Coleman's blog post on global warming was featured and praised on Glenn Beck's dwindling fox news television show.

"Why is it all the scientists are in on this?" Maybe because they're scientists, ass clown.
 Mr. Coleman uses the following “support”:

Ad-hominem attacks: Instead of focusing on evidence John used the tactic of name calling, by reminding us that scientists who collect data in support of global warming are “wacko-types,” "university types" and are “dastardly.”

Slippery Slope Logical Fallacy: According to Mr. Coleman, he assumes the most extreme scenario that scientists are collectively pushing a radical agenda and forcing people to follow it under the guise of global warming.

John's point is that we should not trust scientists, university types or anyone with an education in general about global warming and to dismiss research and intense intellectual scrutiny required to validate said research as a mass conspiracy against consumerism.

Totally. Bro.

Monday, June 13, 2011

Session Madness - Final Four Voting Now Open

Session Madness

We are down to the final bills left to determine which was the worst bill of the 2011 Florida legislative session. You have three days to vote to determine the two worst bills of the year. The Elite 8 saw one of the biggest upsets of the tournament, in my opinion, where the Ultrasound bill defeated the Teacher Tenure Bill.

To vote in the Final Four, go here. To see the original post with full summaries of the bills, go here.

1. HB1355: “Elections Bill” (78%)
3. SB 1744/HB1127: Ultrasound Requirement (56%)

3. HB7185: Corporate Income Tax Cut (52%)
1. SB958/HB7221: TABOR (83%)

Sunday, June 05, 2011

Thursday, June 02, 2011

Festival for Florida's Future


Register here. It's a free event.

When:
Saturday, June 4, 2011 from 10AM – 6PM

Location: 
Central Florida Fairgrounds
4603 West Colonial Drive
Orlando, FL 32808

Highlights: 
KIDS KLUB: Bounce houses, obstacle course, toddler area, face painting, X-BOX truck, fire engine
TRADE DEMO’S: Crane operation simulator, Solar Truck, etc.
RAFFLE: Flat screen TV and other prizes
Speakers & Live Music.

NOTE: All Speakers will be available via live video feed from the event. Please tune in at FightForFloridaLive


Register here. It's a free event.

ITINERARY

10:00AM Ethno Tek Members of the Musicians Union of Orlando

11:00AM Speakers -Silvia Peres, Immokalee Worker, Lily Ekelsen, NEA , VP Silvia Perez, Immokalee farmworker with translator. Since she came to this country, she has been working under extreme work conditions and low pay. Only able to continue in the hopes that her children will have greater opportunity, through quality public education. Now this legislature is cutting more and more, and ensuring that great teachers go elsewhere.

11:30AM Mother Shockers Members of the Musicians Union of Orlando

12:30PM Speakers – Elton and Barbara Wright Husband and wife schoolteachers who, after receiving advanced degrees, teaching for nearly 20 years, including summer school and tutoring, still don’t come close to $100K per year combined. They have a disabled teenage son and now must face a 6% cut their family income, due to changes in FRS.

2:00PM Speakers – Fred Barr & Magda Torres Public sector worker who has lost job and house will talk about how to deal with bills piling up, children suffering and how the 2011 Legislature spent their time giving tax breaks to the rich and beating up public sector unions, instead of creating jobs for the Floridians who are out of work. Magda Torres, radio personality, will highlight some of the stories she hears on her radio show every day and draw connections.

2:30 pm to 3:20 pm Plan B

3:35 pm to 4:25 pm Josh Lamkin & Automatic Heat 2010 Suncoast Blues Challenge Winner, 2011 IBC Semi Finalist

4:40 pm to 5:30 pm The Pitbull of Blues Band 2010 Orange Blossom Blues Society Central Florida Blues Challenge Winner, 2011 IBC Semi Finalist

Workshop Topics:

Speaking to Power: Using your Story and Voice to Fight Back!
Tech Me Over: Online Communication Tools and Resources
Labor Community Solidarity: Why Coalition Building Matters
Labor to Neighbor: How to Build a Grassroots Network in Your Neighborhood
Fighting for Fair Food: The Coalition of Immokalee Workers and Florida’s 21st Century Farmworker Movement
Awake the State: Best Practices Panel
Why Grandma isn’t Dead: Stopping the Destruction of Medicare and Social Security
Affordable Health Care Act
Activist Recruitment: Engaging People in THEIR Political Program
Running for Office 101

Other: Reserved parking and special interview area for media

Rep. Mark Pafford's Letter to Rick Scott

State Rep. Mark Pafford today sent a letter to Gov. Rick Scott asking about Scott's "private" state budget signing event May 26 at The Villages retirement community. Pafford, a Democrat from West Palm Beach, wants to know if the event violated state laws because some Democrats were removed from the event.

The Buzz
TampaBay.com
source

June 2, 2011 

Dear Governor Scott:

Following the state budget signing ceremony on Thursday, May 26, I have been asked numerous times if the event crossed any lines relating to the Florida Constitution, the Sunshine Law or other Florida statutes.

Reports from the press, media and at least one video aired on YouTube suggest that Sheriff’s deputies removed selected attendees from the ceremony, possibly at the request of the Governor’s Office. Those same sources, and my interpretation of the reports and video, indicate that those removed were participants who did not support the budget or who were wearing shirts or holding signs indicating their objection to your administration.

Florida Statute 119.07 permits the request of public records that may assist in resolving the numerous questions that have arisen as a result of the ceremony.  Rather that invoking 119.07, I am requesting that your office simply respond to some specific questions related to the event, and resolve the matter.

Respectfully, I request responses to the following questions:

·         Was the event public or private and how was it promoted?
·         Who had the authority to direct security and crowd control for the event and who made the decision to remove attendees?
·         Which state employees were in attendance and were they reimbursed for travel?
·         Were Sumter County Sheriff’s deputies contracted and by whom?
·         Were participants removed at the request of the Governor’s Office? If so, why?


Thank you in advance for responding to these questions and providing any other information you or your staff feel is important to better understanding what exactly happened at the budget signing ceremony.

I look forward to your response and appreciate your assistance and cooperation regarding this matter.

Sincerely,
MARK PAFFORD
State Representative, District 88

source